COTEP.org  

Go Back   COTEP.org > Main Category > Main Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-18-2012, 02:21 PM
sdmc530's Avatar
sdmc530 sdmc530 is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 15,010
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 4,510
Thanked 2,790 Times in 732 Posts
Default MagHolder Review

Hey all. I was a lucky guy to win one of the MagHolder in the Karma section.
This is my review for the product. I attached a picture below.

First impression that is was nicely packaged and it was not what I was expecting. I thought this will not do what it is supposed to do, but I was proven wrong right away. The magazine was held in strong and firm. There was no wiggle or play once it was completely inserted into the holder. I received this on Fridays mail so immediately put it on my belt with an empty magazine and wore it all day. I did have to make one simple modification I have a bit of a gut you might say and when I would bend over it would rub and it has a bit of a sharp edge so a tough of sandpaper took care of that. So Saturday I loaded the magazine with 230gr (the heaviest load I had) and wore it all day again. I even wore it to church by accident because I forgot I was wearing it. Its a simple but very utilitarian design. It holds the magazine horizontal for very quick reloads with some practice.

Pros:
Simple, Small, easy to use design makes it a very effective mag carrier.
Price point is good, I believe they are sold for $25 shipped and that is a fair price, I would buy one for that price if I didn't get a free one from a karma.

Cons:
Not sure if this is a con but its plastic so you could not wear it as a show or dress holster set up. But I don't really think this is the intended purpose. But that said you will still need a "fancy" one for a show type set up.


I like the holder overall it will be my new range/utility holder. I like the horizontal carry position, can definitely see the advantage with this for quick reloads with some practice.

Thanks......
__________________

Last edited by sdmc530; 07-20-2014 at 11:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-18-2012, 02:24 PM
jmlutz's Avatar
jmlutz jmlutz is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: De Leon,Texas
Posts: 4,337
Thanks: 1,494
Thanked 1,292 Times in 337 Posts
Default

Good Deal, Thanks for the review
__________________
Mike
CBOBO359
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-18-2012, 02:30 PM
NAMVET72's Avatar
NAMVET72 NAMVET72 is offline
Founding Member
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Pa
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 1,399
Thanked 1,478 Times in 295 Posts
Default

Glad You like the Karma you Won ,

Also Good Review......


__________________
CBOB:0002
1905 Savage 380, 1978, 1980 DW Pistol Pacs, Severns Custom 1985 Springer 1911A1, 09 DW Marksman, S&W Model 19-6, GSG 1911 22LR. , S&W Model 29-2
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-18-2012, 09:12 PM
Mghwk Mghwk is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Lehi, UT
Posts: 62
Thanks: 4
Thanked 18 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Thanks for the review. I appreciate the candid and very prompt feedback. The sharp edge thing I will certainly look at. The ones that went out for the Karma are the first production batch. We ran the molds for 1000 cycles, and now need to tear them down, make any adjustments, and nickle plate them for longevity. MagHolders are made of 6/6 15% glass filled nylon, and that makes them very abrasive on the molds. It is also the same stuff they make synthetic rifle stocks from, and is extremely tough. This allows the MagHolder to be minimalist in design and light weight/low profile. When we plate the molds, we can radius the curves a bit to smooth edges.

Your comment on the retention is spot on. Most people wonder if it is going to retain the magazine firmly. Horizontal carry does not impart anywhere near the loads on the carrier that vertical does. It doesn't offer the same type of leverage which tries to pry the mag and holder away from the body and off the belt. Retention needs to be solid, but not severe. This speeds up the draw from the carrier a bunch. I'm also interested in your experience with different mags. The Colt factory mags seem to be the worst when it comes to adhering to the original drawings. The surest retention seems to be with high quality mags like Wilson, McCormick, etc. Even the furthest out of spec mags offer sufficient retention for reliability and security though.

We learned a bunch from the 1911 MagHolder which will be incorporated into the Glock, Springfield XD/XDM, and M&P MagHolders. Those are coming in a matter of weeks.

Thanks again for the review. I look forward to other members trying out MagHolders. Like SDMC said, it is a functional and specific design aimed at concealed carry, but probably not BBQ material unless you're a tool&die maker or plastics nerd, lol. ::
__________________
COTEP #453
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-18-2012, 09:16 PM
NAMVET72's Avatar
NAMVET72 NAMVET72 is offline
Founding Member
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Pa
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 1,399
Thanked 1,478 Times in 295 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mghwk View Post
Thanks for the review. I appreciate the candid and very prompt feedback. The sharp edge thing I will certainly look at. The ones that went out for the Karma are the first production batch. We ran the molds for 1000 cycles, and now need to tear them down, make any adjustments, and nickle plate them for longevity. MagHolders are made of 6/6 15% glass filled nylon, and that makes them very abrasive on the molds. It is also the same stuff they make synthetic rifle stocks from, and is extremely tough. This allows the MagHolder to be minimalist in design and light weight/low profile. When we plate the molds, we can radius the curves a bit to smooth edges.

Your comment on the retention is spot on. Most people wonder if it is going to retain the magazine firmly. Horizontal carry does not impart anywhere near the loads on the carrier that vertical does. It doesn't offer the same type of leverage which tries to pry the mag and holder away from the body and off the belt. Retention needs to be solid, but not severe. This speeds up the draw from the carrier a bunch. I'm also interested in your experience with different mags. The Colt factory mags seem to be the worst when it comes to adhering to the original drawings. The surest retention seems to be with high quality mags like Wilson, McCormick, etc. Even the furthest out of spec mags offer sufficient retention for reliability and security though.

We learned a bunch from the 1911 MagHolder which will be incorporated into the Glock, Springfield XD/XDM, and M&P MagHolders. Those are coming in a matter of weeks.

Thanks again for the review. I look forward to other members trying out MagHolders. Like SDMC said, it is a functional and specific design aimed at concealed carry, but probably not BBQ material unless you're a tool&die maker or plastics nerd, lol. ::

Like You Are???????????????


__________________
CBOB:0002
1905 Savage 380, 1978, 1980 DW Pistol Pacs, Severns Custom 1985 Springer 1911A1, 09 DW Marksman, S&W Model 19-6, GSG 1911 22LR. , S&W Model 29-2
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-18-2012, 09:39 PM
sdmc530's Avatar
sdmc530 sdmc530 is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 15,010
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 4,510
Thanked 2,790 Times in 732 Posts
Default

I didn't try my colt mags will let you know how they fit. I used my kimber mag and my STI mag for the test. I have about 5 brands of mags I will get back to you on the rest.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-18-2012, 09:41 PM
sdmc530's Avatar
sdmc530 sdmc530 is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 15,010
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 4,510
Thanked 2,790 Times in 732 Posts
Default

Oh yeah if I didn't have a gut the edge wouldn't of been an issue, just where you insert the mag is sharp but a simple fix
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-18-2012, 09:55 PM
Riverpigusmc's Avatar
Riverpigusmc Riverpigusmc is offline
Founding Member
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Archer, Florida CSA
Posts: 12,986
Blog Entries: 5
Thanks: 1,961
Thanked 3,484 Times in 717 Posts
Default

are they ambidexterous?
__________________
NRA Life Member
Wilson Combat CQB
Kimber Tactical Pro II
S&W J-Frame .38
ect
" I don't own the clothes I'm wearin', and the road goes on forever "

There's a gator in the bushes, and it's calling my name...
COTEP #523
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-18-2012, 10:36 PM
sdmc530's Avatar
sdmc530 sdmc530 is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 15,010
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 4,510
Thanked 2,790 Times in 732 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverpigusmc View Post
are they ambidexterous?
No they have a left n right hand model I believe
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-19-2012, 03:34 AM
Mghwk Mghwk is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Lehi, UT
Posts: 62
Thanks: 4
Thanked 18 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NAMVET72 View Post
Like You Are???????????????


Ha! Apparently, one can learn to be a nerd by osmosis. I don't want to ruin any credibility by admitting I actually was an English major. I grew up around engineers, though, and inherited a curiosity for how stuff works. I am fortunate to be surrounded by smart people and I ask lots of dumb questions without worrying (or knowing) if they are dumb questions.

I hope SDMC doesn't regret winning this karma after all the questions I'm asking him about his experience with different mags, carry routine, etc.
__________________
COTEP #453
Reply With Quote
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.