COTEP.org  

Go Back   COTEP.org > Main Category > Main Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-27-2012, 12:18 PM
JimF4M1s JimF4M1s is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 332
Thanks: 7
Thanked 11 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Xxxxx

Last edited by JimF4M1s; 05-14-2013 at 09:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-27-2012, 05:45 AM
Roverron's Avatar
Roverron Roverron is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA, America
Posts: 3,974
Thanks: 71
Thanked 540 Times in 279 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve CT View Post
Connecticut's first Gun Control attempt looks like it will include:

-Prohibit the sale and possession of any rifle, shotgun or pistol magazine with a capacity of more than 10 rounds;
-Expand the definition of an ‘assault weapon’ under current Connecticut state law to apply to firearms which exhibit just one particular physical trait, as opposed to two (i.e., the presence of a pistol grip beneath the action of the weapon) which will make it an Assault Weapon and not legal in CT
-Require the registration with state law enforcement officials—and the biennial registration renewal—of all firearms by model and serial number;
-Institute a 50-percent sales tax on the sale of ammunition and firearms magazines;
-Require a permit to purchase ammunition;
-Prohibit the online purchase of ammunition;
-Prohibit the purchase of ammunition in Connecticut by anyone who is not legally authorized to possess a firearm in Connecticut;
- Prohibit the storage of firearms and ammunition in a manner that allows access by persons under age 18.

This legislation is written and ready to submit when the new Legislative session opens
I'm glad I don't live there. Here in Oklahoma, we're trying to require armed presence in our schools similar to what Texas does now. Heck, we now have open carry if one is inclined to do that.
In other words instead of taking away rights we're giving out more. It's not perfect but it's for sure not kalifornica, Chicago, Bloomberg NY, DC, or it seems possibly CT.....??.
__________________
Ron
#CBOB0604
Proud Member: "Team Ranstad"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-28-2012, 12:23 PM
Riverpigusmc's Avatar
Riverpigusmc Riverpigusmc is offline
Founding Member
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Archer, Florida CSA
Posts: 13,002
Blog Entries: 6
Thanks: 1,963
Thanked 3,495 Times in 720 Posts
Default

I have NO faith in out pro gun members of Congress. None. Zero point crap
__________________
NRA Life Member
Wilson Combat CQB
Kimber Tactical Pro II
S&W J-Frame .38
ect
" I don't own the clothes I'm wearin', and the road goes on forever "

There's a gator in the bushes, and it's calling my name...
COTEP #523
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:25 PM
Steve CT Steve CT is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Central CT
Posts: 286
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 4 Posts
Default

The Federal legislation proposal coming identifies an assault weapon by one feature as well. Again, pistol grip is all it takes. Also requiring NFA registration, including fees, and all the other BATFE crap that goes with it. Grandfathering to current owner, but no transfer or sale. Once you die, your AR is seized and scrapped.

Might not matter what state you are in, read it and weep:

http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/publ...2-ac8ca4359119
__________________
COTEP CBOB 0636
DW PM-1S #106
www.danwessonforum.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:28 PM
Roverron's Avatar
Roverron Roverron is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA, America
Posts: 3,974
Thanks: 71
Thanked 540 Times in 279 Posts
Default

Still will not ever get out of congress. This is smoke-blowing........
__________________
Ron
#CBOB0604
Proud Member: "Team Ranstad"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-29-2012, 11:49 PM
SCORPIO SCORPIO is offline
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Central PA
Posts: 123
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Default

The part about registration has me confused. How will they know if you have any firearms that need to be registered? I always thought that when a background check is run and the make, model, and serial number are recorded on the form that it was in effect a registration.
I'm sure all criminals will register their Glocks, AR's and AK's, sure they will....NOT!

All this registration crap does is allow the government to collect info on how many guns are out there, what types, who owns them and how many each person has. This is of course necessary for when they decide the new regs aren't working and decide they need to confiscate ALL guns from everyone for our own safety. And of course the bad guys will turn in all their guns too, NOT!

I'm sorry but I think we are being railroaded on this one.
__________________
Any gun you're carrying is better than any gun at home in the safe.

COTEP Member# CBOB0686
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-30-2012, 01:31 AM
dw1911's Avatar
dw1911 dw1911 is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Rural Southwest Virginia
Posts: 2,351
Thanks: 618
Thanked 1,547 Times in 465 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCORPIO View Post
The part about registration has me confused. How will they know if you have any firearms that need to be registered? I always thought that when a background check is run and the make, model, and serial number are recorded on the form that it was in effect a registration.
I'm sure all criminals will register their Glocks, AR's and AK's, sure they will....NOT!

All this registration crap does is allow the government to collect info on how many guns are out there, what types, who owns them and how many each person has. This is of course necessary for when they decide the new regs aren't working and decide they need to confiscate ALL guns from everyone for our own safety. And of course the bad guys will turn in all their guns too, NOT!

I'm sorry but I think we are being railroaded on this one.
Well, IF that stupid bill were to be passed, ( It won't) Then the registration thing WOULD be the 1st step before outright conficastion occurred. Of course, in most cases, it would have be voluntary, since "they" really don't have a way of knowing where all the guns are. In most states, you fill out a 4473, you're approved to buy the firearm, they don't know IF you actually bought it! Stay off the radar and don't panic. I am sure this will pass soon enough.
We're safe. Biden is in charge.

Guns? What guns? Sold them all at a Gun Show!
__________________
1911 Pistols can be additive!
COTEP CBOB0586
No freeman shall be debarred the use of arms.
Thomas Jefferson
“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-30-2012, 12:44 PM
Roverron's Avatar
Roverron Roverron is offline
Founding Member
COTEP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA, America
Posts: 3,974
Thanks: 71
Thanked 540 Times in 279 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dw1911 View Post
Well, IF that stupid bill were to be passed, ( It won't) Then the registration thing WOULD be the 1st step before outright conficastion occurred. Of course, in most cases, it would have be voluntary, since "they" really don't have a way of knowing where all the guns are. In most states, you fill out a 4473, you're approved to buy the firearm, they don't know IF you actually bought it! Stay off the radar and don't panic. I am sure this will pass soon enough.
We're safe. Biden is in charge.

Guns? What guns? Sold them all at a Gun Show!

As my sig line says......mine fell overboard in a boating accident!
__________________
Ron
#CBOB0604
Proud Member: "Team Ranstad"
Reply With Quote
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.