![]() |
|
Register | Forums | Blogs | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Donate |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]()
It was part consternation that they would change the traditional design and part the dismal failure of the design.
SIG has not been without their issues with their extractors mostly on the P-series but also on the 1911s. I believe it had to do with the "short" extractor. I have to admit there is an aesthetic appear to the internal extractor on a 1911. However, it really doesn't make much difference to me as long as it works.
__________________
COTEP CBOB #289 "Deserve's got nothing to do with it". |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]()
I suppose, given the attitude of many 1911 aficionados and the history of the design, it may have been deemed wise to take the conservative route and stick with the internal extractor.
You're probably NOT going to put anyone off with the internal extractor but definitely WILL put off a large number of enthusiasts with the external extractor. SIG had already "messed" with the design with the change in the slide profile which they continue to use predominantly in their 1911s with only a minimal node to the original design with their "traditional" models. Even there, they use the external extractor. S&W doesn't seem to be that large a player in the 1911 market, but perhaps that isn't an accurate perception. I expect some people will buy a S&W 1911 simply because it is S&W as some will buy a SIG 1911 simply because it is a SIG.
__________________
COTEP CBOB #289 "Deserve's got nothing to do with it". |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]()
All I knew about Sig before buying my first Sig 1911 was that they had a reputation for good triggers. I bought my first Sig because I could not find a VBob, much less afford one, and I looked at the Sig Fastback Carry as sort of a "Poor Man's VBob."
I was so impressed, I turned around and bought another Sig shortly thereafter (the one in my Signature). So now, I have four 1911s with extractors (One DW, two Sigs, and one Mimber 22 Conversion slide) and the DW and Sigs just work. The Mimber 22 slide sometimes will leave a round in the chamber after firing. At the time I got it, I was not aware of the history of 1911 external extractors, and I studied it carefully to determine why it was slipping off of the rim. After careful analysis, I determined that the extractor was simply too short. I had previous experience with short extractor problems - a Walther P-38 - that exhibited similar behavior to the Mimber 22 slide. What happens is that when you have a case that is difficult to extract, the short extractor quickly loses its grip because the angle of engagement with the rim changes very rapidly if the extractor swivels out slightly. On a long extractor, the angle doesn't change as much when the extractor swivels out a little. On an internal extractor, the extractor would have to bend for the angle to change because it doesn't swivel out like an external extractor. Here is a graphic to illustrate: I'm not so enamored of the internal extractors after going through hell with my Colt Series 80 (that gun wrote the book on 1911 malfunctions). And my Rock has some extractor issues of it's own (at least that's what people say causes it to eject forward)
__________________
Jim CBOB0497 "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working class flat or laborer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there." - George Orwell Last edited by DrHenley; 11-29-2014 at 01:22 PM. |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]()
My Kimber has the external extractor. Never had a problem with it, but if you notice, Kimber went back to the internal, probably with good reason
__________________
NRA Life Member Wilson Combat CQB Kimber Tactical Pro II S&W J-Frame .38 ect " I don't own the clothes I'm wearin', and the road goes on forever " ![]() There's a gator in the bushes, and it's calling my name... COTEP #523 |
![]() |
Tags |
1911, extractor |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |