![]() |
|
Register | Forums | Blogs | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Donate |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]()
I'm no expert on the matter, but from what I know, "fracking" is bad for the enviroment and is the worst way to get oil.
That being said, the idiots that other Californians elected, not me could definetely eff up boiling a pot of water. |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
I've read plenty of things that throw cold water on the "bad for the environment" argument. Not saying they are true, but like "climate theory", I distrust objections by environmentalists who have already proven themselves to be lying bastards. Now it might be more expensive, but that's for the oil companies to work out. Just my two cents. Worth what you payed for it. Tom
__________________
If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen. -- Samuel Adams COTEP CBOB0676 KO4ENQ |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Bottom line, America has plenty of oil fields/places to drill. But the damn enviromentalists are the ones keeping us dependant on foriegn oil! |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]()
And yet one of the biggest FBHO supporters is GE and...
One of America's corporate giants is investing billions of dollars in the new boom of oil and gas drilling, or fracking. General Electric Co. is opening a new laboratory in Oklahoma, buying up related companies, and placing a big bet that cutting-edge science will improve profits for clients and reduce the environmental and health effects of the boom. "We like the oil and gas base because we see the need for resources for a long time to come," said Mark Little, a senior vice president. He said GE did "almost nothing" in oil and gas just over a decade ago but has invested more than $15 billion in the past few years. Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/05/28...#ixzz2UiHKk8p5
__________________
Ron #CBOB0604 Proud Member: "Team Ranstad" |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]()
I was taken in by the anti-fracking propaganda. Then I learned that it is just that - propaganda, with less actual science behind it than global warming.
The dire things they blamed on fracking were actually already occurring prior to fracking. Read the claims carefully. They go something like this: "Methane ground water contamination is higher near fracking sites." Yeah, because the methane concentrations are and always have been higher in those areas, long before fracking. THAT'S WHY THE GAS WELLS ARE THERE AND NOT SOMEWHERE ELSE! Natural gas is primarily methane. Correlation does not prove causality! Every time you FART, YOU release methane! You have to look at foreign media to find out that THIS YEAR, the U.S. EPA estimates of methane leakage from fracking has gone down 20%, even though production has gone up by 40%: http://www.3news.co.nz/Fracking-gas-...1/Default.aspx BTW, my father has a degree in geological engineering. I have a PhD in Chemical Engineering.
__________________
Jim CBOB0497 "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working class flat or laborer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there." - George Orwell |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |