|
|
| Register | Forums | Blogs | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Donate |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
#1
04-01-2012, 11:24 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
MIM... there is a difference.
Ive got a kimmy. Carry her everywhere. Shoots perfect. Every good forum needs something to pick on. Kimber is the butt of most "jokes."
__________________
COTEP CCO0449 The Present is the instant flash of reality in which the ever approaching Future becomes the Past.................. The Constitution is my Caesar 
|
|
#2
04-01-2012, 11:47 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
04-02-2012, 10:29 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
My own take on this is that MIM was invented to make tooling tough enough to cut the newer super alloys. If done right, MIM parts should be pretty much indestructible.
On the other hand, I don't like additional firing pin blocking systems in a 1911. Why add complexity (and possible failure points) you don't really need? If I were looking to buy a Kimber, I'd look for a pre-II gun. On the other hand, for $600 I might learn to like a II.  Randall
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Hybrid Mode