![]() |
|
Register | Forums | Blogs | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Donate |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
It's times and circumstances like that, that I wish we had deadly force/threat of deadly force as a defense against property crimes... similar to Texas. That said, I think this gentleman is going to be in world of hurt. If it were NJ, there'd be no question that he'd face all kinds of charges (manslaughter at minimum) as NJ has a duty to retreat, even inside your house/property. |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]()
If you are in fear of a wet, naked man in your shower, shoot. But I think you'll have a hard time proving it was a reasoned response, regardless of the Castle doctrine.
__________________
COTEP #719 "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed one." - Thomas Jefferson quoting Cesare Beccaria |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]()
I'll withhold my opinion until more facts come out.
The facts, as they are presented, do not make it look good for the shooter IMO.
__________________
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. To speak without thinking is to shoot without aiming. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |