COTEP.org

COTEP.org (https://www.cotep.org/forum/index.php)
-   Reloading Bench (https://www.cotep.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Figuring Energy of a round (https://www.cotep.org/forum/showthread.php?t=7892)

DrHenley 04-15-2014 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColMike (Post 74426)
The ICAO standard accepted for the gravitational constant is 32.1742 which gives 450,437.4. Speer uses this standard number for acceleration due to gravity. Although several online sources use the alternate value, I can not find a 'why' to the use of it.

Because of the different centrifugal force, the gravity at the equator is smaller than that at the poles. So the precise gravitational acceleration is a function of latitude. They just took the gravitational acceleration at 45° Latitude (halfway between the poles and the equator) as the standard. Paris is at 48.86°, New York City is at 40.67°.

Poles: 32.26 ft/sē
Equator: 32.09 ft/sē
45° Latitude: 32.17 ft/sē

ColMike 04-15-2014 09:07 PM

[QUOTE=DrHenley;74487]Because of the different centrifugal force, the gravity at the equator is smaller than that at the poles. So the precise gravitational acceleration is a function of latitude. They just took the gravitational acceleration at 45° Latitude (halfway between the poles and the equator) as the standard. Paris is at 48.86°, New York City is at 40.67°.

Poles: 32.26 ft/sē
Equator: 32.09 ft/sē
45° Latitude: 32.17 ft/sē[/QUOTE

Excellent, thanks!

Lonestar grips. 04-15-2014 09:29 PM

now my Brain hurts:faint:

DrHenley 04-16-2014 07:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lonestar grips. (Post 74504)
now my Brain hurts:faint:

Here, let me help :D

Here is how you find the acceleration due to gravity at any particular latitude (at sea level of course):

http://www.cotep.org/forum/picture.p...&pictureid=740

g45: 32.17 ft/sē
gpoles: 32.26 ft/sē
gequator: 32.09 ft/sē
π: 3.1415927

Lonestar grips. 04-16-2014 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrHenley (Post 74520)
Here, let me help :D

Here is how you find the acceleration due to gravity at any particular latitude (at sea level of course):

http://www.cotep.org/forum/picture.p...&pictureid=740

g45: 32.17 ft/sē
gpoles: 32.26 ft/sē
gequator: 32.09 ft/sē
π: 3.1415927


well now it makes sense:D

TLE2 04-16-2014 02:55 PM

I love math! is latitude in degrees or radians?

TLE2 04-16-2014 02:59 PM

Found this on Yahoo Answers:

Quote:

Altitude
Acceleration due to gravity decreases as the inverse of the square of the distance from the center of mass of the body imparting the gravitational acceleration; g=k/x2
Because the earth is not perfectly spherical, the distance from the center of the earth for any person standing on the surface depends upon the latitude L.
The equatorial radius of the earth is approximately 6,378,140 meters.
The polar radius is approximately 6,356,755 meters.
If we model the earth as an ellipsoid, this means that the radius of the earth at latitude L is given by R= 6,356,755* sqrt( 1 + .0067396*cos2(L) ).
At the latitude of Terre Haute, this is approximately 6,369,502 meters.
Thus, a person at altitude of H meters above sea level experiences and acceleration due to gravity of
a= g*R2/(R+H)2.
G310 is at approximately 580 feet above sea level. This is roughly 176.8 meters above sea level.
This gives an acceleration due to gravity of approximately 9.8095794 meters per second2.
Moving to the classroom ceiling, this constant becomes 9.8095701 meters per second2.
Moving to the circle in front of Hadley Hall (L-> .689103, H->180m), we get an acceleration due to gravity of approximately 9.80956953 meters per second2.

AutoMag 04-16-2014 04:11 PM

Way to technical for me!!!:D

DrHenley 04-16-2014 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLE2 (Post 74538)
I love math! is latitude in degrees or radians?

Degrees

The π/180 part converts degrees to radians. If you have the latitude in radians already, just leave out the π/180 part.

Dave Waits 04-17-2014 10:17 AM

Gentlemen, we're figuring energy for handgun and rifle bullets, not the Space Shuttle!

As the Good Colonel aptly put it, a few final inch*pounds at this level are unnecessary. It's getting taken way above most pay-grades on here.

All I was trying to do was to put a simple yet fairly accurate formula in front of the guys. Nobody on this forum is going to be taking one-mile .416Barrett shots on Terrorists.

You guys are making my head spin and I have a math background myself, though evidently not as heavy as some of you. LOL!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.